🔗 Share this article

An unexpected connection on the professional network. A proposal of employment from a recruiter, probably a young woman, operating from China. The opportunity to earn around £20,000 on the side writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a Chinese company containing “non-public” or privileged information. Compensation in cryptocurrency or physical money favored.

It may seem clear, on this telling, that an element about this approach would be suspicious. However, Beijing's powerful intelligence agency continues to view it valuable to use headhunters to attempt this – prompting MI5 to warn repeatedly about their activity online.

Massive Approaches on Professional Networks

Last year, MI5 chief Ken McCallum said operatives from China were contacting UK citizens on LinkedIn on an extraordinary level, at a rate of ten thousand over the previous 30-month period, seeking political, commercial, military and technological classified information. But a fresh campaign targeting politicians and Westminster has prompted the intelligence service to act again.

An espionage alert was issued on this week via the administrative teams of the Commons speaker and his Lords counterpart: a single slide after the persistent attempts of Shirly Shen and other operatives to contact Members of Parliament, peers, their assistants, economists, research organizations – anybody who might become a source.

Intelligence Strategy and Legislative Updates

In the curious style of UK security services, there was no publication of the security advice from the agency or the Home Office. Yet the service was aware its advisory document would become public once it was emailed out to Westminster. Republishing it in the press helps the wider public more easily recognize communications with a deceptive intent.

This warning has the effect of uncovering more information from within Westminster, although that is not the agency's primary purpose. The service wants people in public life to understand that simply because interactions on professional networks are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it doesn't imply they are completely safe.

Additionally, the domestic spy agency understood to have been responding to any specific incident in parliament, although the burst of activity does come after the awkward collapse of the legal case of a former parliamentary aide an individual and his friend Christopher Berry on a legal detail earlier in the autumn.

Both individuals had been charged of working for the foreign power – a charge they denied – but inability to complete a trial under the since replaced Official Secrets Act resulted in warnings that British democracy had been insufficiently defended.

Updated Legislation and Beijing's Strategic Interests

Legislation has now been changed, and the MI5 slide includes a note of its successor: “Those engaging in espionage activity risk significant criminal penalties under the new security law.” This constitutes a criminal offense if somebody participates in behavior that could potentially “materially assist a overseas spy agency”.

A natural inquiry, though, is what China has to achieve. An elected representative who is not a government minister will have limited access of classified material, and an associate of theirs less so. Yet the Chinese government is also interested in the legislative body: for a period, in recent years, the Britain's China policy on matters such as Huawei or the human rights situation or genocide was being influenced by MPs.

Cultural Variations and Persistent Cyber Risks

In part there are distinct approaches too. Autocratic regimes like Beijing's utilize information gathering techniques and the size of its spy network is vast, engaging three hundred thousand people. A former US official, a American cybersecurity head under the US administration, said it was sometimes estimated that “the Chinese have greater linguistic capacity involved in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is prepared to cultivate contacts over the long term and at times even the agencies have struggled to distinguish between genuine connections and spying. “Beijing has a minimal requirement for what information is considered to be of value,” the minister responsible Dan Jarvis told MPs on this week, but a sudden turn in the government situation may result in an individual quickly peripheral turning significant.

An alternative perspective to think about the continuous efforts at covert information gathering is in the wider context of the international competition between China and the west at a level below the level of outright war. The nation has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of phone and data networks in 80 countries, and the another operation breach of millions internet devices.

Beijing is engaged in persistent attempts to identify secret informants on British democracy online because it wants to be challenging, to display influence and because it can.